Racelands...Rice or worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2011, 08:22 AM
  #11  
MFz Regular
Thread Starter
 
Mazduh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Track
Are you trying to get serious about track events? If that is so, maybe ricelands will be ok, but I would be prepared to buy new coils within the year, especially if you daily and/or autox the car.

If you are not trying to track the car, then adjustable height coilovers just aren't for you. The whole point of having adjustable ride height is so you can change corner weight and cross balance the car.

Winter seems like a lousy excuse, but its understandable if you are looking for hellaflush.
Yes I would like to get as much seat time as possible. Rollbar is going in soon, next summer I'd like to start doing highspeed autocross.

I'm kinda looking for cheapish lowness too. I think I will most likely run FM springs for now and save my pennies for fm Vmaxx or something better.

The only reason I'm concerned with height adjustment is the car being a daily. Where I work the street's arn't the greatest, I already barely get by at stock ride height. I'm worried I'll do springs and regret the height. I guess your right though about getting an alignment with every adjustment. That totally slipped my mind.
Mazduh is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:48 AM
  #12  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

well, you can do custom springs or whatever you like. just pick up the shock you like, and then you can either use summitracing or our own trackspeed engineering to get springs. eShocks has eibach/hypercoil also, but I have never used them.

I don't really your roads and things like that, but from a track prespective its a better idea not to change your suspension until you are comfortable with the limits of the car.

Stock suspension has a lot of travel which helps good bit when you make mistakes (put a wheel off, or hit a hump too hard, or get on a bad gator). Plus, the miata is mighty balanced on stock settings and should help out with the learning. Once you are comfortable at the limit, or are faster than the car, then you can start putting on shocks and springs and all that. Lastly, it seems your suspension knowledge maybe limited at this time. Its a good idea to read up on coilovers, alignment, and general suspension stuff.

Last edited by Track; 08-16-2011 at 08:52 AM.
Track is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 09:35 AM
  #13  
MFz Lurker
 
95MerlotM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Portland, TN
Posts: 25
Default

i know this may be this forums first raceland thread but cmon! if you see raceland bashing on other forums, there is a good chance they are ----. ive never owned them but ive ridden on them and they are comparable to a stock suspension. as a coilover........... they sucks. save up and get some EZ Streets<------ thats the best bang for the buck(i dont own those either, i have stiff as ---- streets)
95MerlotM is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 09:51 AM
  #14  
Moderator
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL; Lake Jackson (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 1,902
Default

If you lower the car but then can't drive it on the streets where you live what have you benefited? I know guys with lowered cars that can't go to certain restaurants and stores because they can't enter the parking lot. They must park down the street somewhere and walk.

Don't get me wrong, I like a tastefully lower than stock car but I also like to go out on the town without being in constant fear. Compromise is good.

I also wouldn't do any lowering without changing the stock bumpstop arrangement.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 10:33 AM
  #15  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
If you lower the car but then can't drive it on the streets where you live what have you benefited? I know guys with lowered cars that can't go to certain restaurants and stores because they can't enter the parking lot. They must park down the street somewhere and walk.

Don't get me wrong, I like a tastefully lower than stock car but I also like to go out on the town without being in constant fear. Compromise is good.

I also wouldn't do any lowering without changing the stock bumpstop arrangement
.
Thats great advice on the compromise. I thought the NB didn't have bumpstop problems like the NA? care to elaborate more (although I personally find the stock suspension too soft w/ too much body roll on the track, I have only been on my bumpstops during autox).
Track is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:00 PM
  #16  
MFz Regular
Thread Starter
 
Mazduh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Track
Thats great advice on the compromise. I thought the NB didn't have bumpstop problems like the NA? care to elaborate more (although I personally find the stock suspension too soft w/ too much body roll on the track, I have only been on my bumpstops during autox).
This^

My suspension knowledge is pretty limited. I know what a bumpstop is and it's function, but as far as what might be better or worse I'm clueless. Teach me sensei!
Mazduh is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:20 PM
  #17  
Moderator
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL; Lake Jackson (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 1,902
Default

The NB has a little bit more travel before hitting the bumpstops but still relies on them to be helper springs when the weak regular springs bottom out. Mazda used the bumpstops to serve as higher rate springs. When the shocks contact the bumpstops the effective spring rate goes very high. If the rear contacts but the front doesn't the effective spring rate in the rear can be far greater than the front and can cause a tendency for the car to spin.


If you want to increase your roll stiffness but like your ride as it is, larger sway bars are a useful compromise. They are also a cheaper initial step for the financially conscious.

Here is something for you NB guys to play with:
http://www.fatcatmotorsports.com/FRC...MSDS_1_8NB.htm

But you might do better to start with the tutorial that walks you through the adjustments calculator:
http://www.fatcatmotorsports.com/FRC...S_TUTORIAL.htm

You all need to read about the design of the suspensions if you haven't previously. Spend some time on :http://www.fatcatmotorsports.com/index.htm
and read awhile on every little part.

Last edited by sixshooter; 08-16-2011 at 01:25 PM.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:05 PM
  #18  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

cool cool, those resources are great. I know I have spent hours sporadically with the FCM suspension calculator to work out spring rates and the like.

Good to know about the mazda bit, I will be getting off the stock suspension here by the end of the year hopefully!
Track is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 07:19 PM
  #19  
MFz Regular
 
saedrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 73
Default

Phil, your car is too nice to sully it with ---- suspension. If you want moar lowe, get some H&R Race springs and use them until you can afford something legit. I've been on my H&R's for 4 years now, and I think the wheel gap and daily ride is perfect (I also have AGX's, but you have Bilsteins IIRC so you'll be fine).
saedrin is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 11:51 PM
  #20  
MFz Regular
 
bigx5murf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 220
Default

Can the ricelands even be set higher than stock? I know many coilovers are dropped at least an inch even at max height.
bigx5murf is offline  


Quick Reply: Racelands...Rice or worth it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.