Off Topic Discussion Anything goes in here! Well, almost!

Ramble On & on & on & on

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2012, 11:40 AM
  #451  
Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
MF-Brain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Arlington, Va
Posts: 1,233
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
I'm not particularly happy with the progress being made on the downpipe for my car. I know now that I will end up re-doing it later. The kid spent half a day on it yesterday and is only half done with it. He hasn't started redoing the hangars or adding the o2 bung yet. He is pie cutting all the bends and not very well. Oh well, it'll get me by until my ace turbo Ferrari fabricator gets freed up next month. I'll get him to take a stab at it next.
what the hell. two 90° bends is all you need.
MF-Brain is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 04:49 PM
  #452  
Moderator
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL; Lake Jackson (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 1,902
Default

Originally Posted by MF-Brain
what the hell. two 90° bends is all you need.
Almost, but for some reason the tards designing manifolds always center the turbine inlet between cyls 2 and 3 instead of centering it on 2 to leave a little room for less restrictive downpipe bends. I don't like it.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 01:22 PM
  #453  
MFz Regular
 
Schadenfreude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 486
Default

so which NB head gives better gains on an NA block? or rather is a VVT head even worth considering or will a non-vvt do it.
Schadenfreude is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 01:46 PM
  #454  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

vvt is good if you are planning to spend lots of times and money to get it right.

otherwise the 99s flow better and have more choices in cams.
Track is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:13 PM
  #455  
MFz Regular
 
Schadenfreude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by Track
vvt is good if you are planning to spend lots of times and money to get it right.

otherwise the 99s flow better and have more choices in cams.
cool. i'm thinking of a slight shave, port & polish as well as cams on the nb head before slapping it on the stock na8ce block. then slowly do teh bolt ons like the square IM & racingbeat headers + ms2, AFM delete, and a slightly bored TB &. idk what cams would go with it though.

Last edited by Schadenfreude; 03-12-2012 at 02:18 PM.
Schadenfreude is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:23 PM
  #456  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

well, I like the square top because its plug and play, but If I am going to do a IM + boring the TB, I would just go with the honda IM.

The rest is good, but if you do some "extreme" you will really want to get a header made for the cams and RPMs you go for, so that RB header will need to go.

Otherwise, I would go with a OBX or equivalent Ebay header.
Track is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:30 PM
  #457  
MFz Regular
 
Schadenfreude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 486
Default

well i want a setup that gives me a more oomph on low to mid range but safe enough so that i can aggressively bounce off the rev limiter in second lol. basically reliable with more juice.

maybe i should just keep the na8ce head and just add a skunk2 IM + tb as well as a RB header on it along with my exhintake + ms2? boosting is out of the question i want reliability, easy/less hassle to maintain.
Schadenfreude is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:37 PM
  #458  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

the NB head is not a bad idea, just turn up the rev limit to 7500 rpms (and you won't have to bounce off the limiter at the ax), thats what hte JDM/EUDM models ran anyway. 7500 is safe on stock internals and all that junk from my reading.

Bouncing off the limiter in stock form is pretty safe (although some people will argue about this, so if thats the case lets make a new thread for that).
Track is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:39 PM
  #459  
MFz Regular
 
Schadenfreude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by Track
the NB head is not a bad idea, just turn up the rev limit to 7500 rpms (and you won't have to bounce off the limiter at the ax), thats what hte JDM/EUDM models ran anyway. 7500 is safe on stock internals and all that junk from my reading.

Bouncing off the limiter in stock form is pretty safe (although some people will argue about this, so if thats the case lets make a new thread for that).
what kind of work should i do to the head?
Schadenfreude is offline  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:42 PM
  #460  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

Don't know, you will have to read about htat. never had a rebuilt head, but I would certainly get the valves overbored by some amount.
Track is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.