all motor
#41
the 01 bottom end over the 99? Thats surprising, I wonder what is different between them other than the thrust bearing? I was lead to believe that the difference is in the head with the VVT and some cooling port changes for improved cooling at the rear (with a sacrifice at the front cylinder).
I still think the mazdaspeed engine has a serious cooling advantage over any other combination of head+bottom end.
I still think the mazdaspeed engine has a serious cooling advantage over any other combination of head+bottom end.
#42
Interesting you ask...
https://www.miataforumz.com/nb-1998-2005-7/thoughts-either-option-273/
follow the links in that thread!
https://www.miataforumz.com/nb-1998-2005-7/thoughts-either-option-273/
follow the links in that thread!
#44
I can't really explain it well, I suggest you read the 4 page thread thoroughly. it is covered on page 3 and page 4.
#46
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=372717
159whp.
#48
The "curve" is the torque curve of the engine. The broader and flatter the curve, the faster the car will be, all other things being equal (drivetrain, etc). Thus you would need more power in a car that primarily made power at a higher, narrower RPM range to be equivalent, i.e. same Elapsed Time, in a pure acceleration test.
Given a road course, the outcome could be different.
Last edited by Johnny2Bad; 10-03-2011 at 03:39 PM.
#49
I don't believe that. Turbo lag is supposed to be a thing of the past nowadays with proper tuning. So I don't see NA having a significant torque curve advantage.
As for NA having an advantage on a road course. I think that's due more to finer control over the throttle especially mid corner. Turbo cars will boost even at part throttle, so throttle position control is kind numb.
As for NA having an advantage on a road course. I think that's due more to finer control over the throttle especially mid corner. Turbo cars will boost even at part throttle, so throttle position control is kind numb.
#50
I don't believe that. Turbo lag is supposed to be a thing of the past nowadays with proper tuning. So I don't see NA having a significant torque curve advantage.
As for NA having an advantage on a road course. I think that's due more to finer control over the throttle especially mid corner. Turbo cars will boost even at part throttle, so throttle position control is kind numb.
As for NA having an advantage on a road course. I think that's due more to finer control over the throttle especially mid corner. Turbo cars will boost even at part throttle, so throttle position control is kind numb.
Regardless, the area under the curve isn't theory; it's what every serious engine builder pays close attention to.
As for the rest, reread the post; I suggested the turbo car wins the road course, where the strategy differs from a drag race.
The reason being you can choose gears in a road course and thus have control over the powerband you're using; with a drag race you don't choose gears; you run through them, so the torque values available at the RPM your next gear drops to becomes critical.
You should be dropping into the peak torque or just below Peak Torque RPM with each shift for lowest ET. With a broad curve you are in good shape there.
If Miata drivetrains were more robust you could launch at 4,500 RPM in the turbo car and be golden. But, I suspect most people wouldn't try that on their lightly modded, stock differential-equipped 200 RWHP turbo cars.
Although you'd have to take a few passes to figure out what's best for your car, I'd expect most drag race Miatas are doing second gear launches.
Last edited by Johnny2Bad; 10-03-2011 at 08:31 PM.