Built in lag?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2011, 08:13 AM
  #31  
Moderator
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL; Lake Jackson (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 1,902
Default

The throttle plate being closed at idle keeps the intake manifold in vacuum. It will be in vacuum even if the compressor is producing some pressure in the piping between the turbo and the throttle body.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 08-19-2011, 08:55 AM
  #32  
MFz Lurker
Thread Starter
 
loki34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dansville NY
Posts: 32
Default

Ok, that's what I thought. So any idea if the turbo I have will be good enough for low boost.
loki34 is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 02:09 PM
  #33  
MFz Lurker
Thread Starter
 
loki34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dansville NY
Posts: 32
Default

Not to start nor suggest I planning on this but---after reading many post on MTurbo and the many solutions to increasing fuel under boost has anybody tried just adding a centrally located injector(s). It seems that a simple injector driver ran off the original signal could then power them. Add a wide-band O2 sens and an adjustable fpr and you could tune whatever mixture you needed. Does this make any sense at all.
loki34 is offline  
Old 08-21-2011, 03:02 PM
  #34  
MFz Lurker
 
Full_Tilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Jesusville, FL
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by loki34
Not to start nor suggest I planning on this but---after reading many post on MTurbo and the many solutions to increasing fuel under boost has anybody tried just adding a centrally located injector(s). It seems that a simple injector driver ran off the original signal could then power them. Add a wide-band O2 sens and an adjustable fpr and you could tune whatever mixture you needed. Does this make any sense at all.
Its been done, but that is ancient technology.
A remote injector is not guaranteed to equal distribute fuel between cylinders, plus there will be issues with puddling and whatnot. The manifold is not designed to have fuel in it.
Also, you will have no provisions for tuning ignition timing, which will limit how much power you can make.

There is no excuse to do half-assed stuff like that when there are cheap and effective options like the megasquirt.
Full_Tilt is offline  
Old 08-21-2011, 07:21 PM
  #35  
MFz Lurker
Thread Starter
 
loki34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dansville NY
Posts: 32
Default

I know going with megasquirt solves all of that, was just curious if it had been tried. I know the timing issue needs to be addressed too, as to the intake issue, an exta bung welded into each intake runner would put the fuel where you want it. I have been reading on a number of the forums about megasquirt and have more questions than before. Need to do more reading then decide which unit is best for me. When I get to that point I will asked more questions and try to do this right the first time.
loki34 is offline  
Old 09-17-2011, 12:45 PM
  #36  
MFz Lurker
Thread Starter
 
loki34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dansville NY
Posts: 32
Default

OK, I'm back. Having read A LOT of post on MT I've at least figured out that with all the bandaids needed to make a car safe and reliable Megasquirt is the way to go. Still need to keep cost down some but if I assemble it myself some money can be saved. From what I've read using MS in a piggyback capacity is a little less complicated, maybe. So my question is, with cost being a factor, Which MS will do the job for a low boost setup without breaking the bank? My car is not a track car ever, just want a little more power for easier driveability. Lots of hills where I live so a little more hp would be nice.
loki34 is offline  
Old 09-17-2011, 04:59 PM
  #37  
BAMFr
 
Track's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,787
Default

Originally Posted by loki34
OK, I'm back. Having read A LOT of post on MT I've at least figured out that with all the bandaids needed to make a car safe and reliable Megasquirt is the way to go. Still need to keep cost down some but if I assemble it myself some money can be saved. From what I've read using MS in a piggyback capacity is a little less complicated, maybe. So my question is, with cost being a factor, Which MS will do the job for a low boost setup without breaking the bank? My car is not a track car ever, just want a little more power for easier driveability. Lots of hills where I live so a little more hp would be nice.
the one Brain makes.
Track is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 08:13 AM
  #38  
Moderator
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL; Lake Jackson (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 1,902
Default

Originally Posted by Track
the one Brain makes.
+1 He will make one tailored to fit your setup and needs. The price is right and it is a complete solution. It's a real no Brain-er. :gag:
sixshooter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shoult
Miata Parts for Sale & Wanted
2
02-10-2014 07:40 AM
Lucid
NA (1989-1997)
12
07-14-2012 12:23 AM
Jeff Abbott
Miata Parts for Sale & Wanted
0
03-21-2012 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: Built in lag?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.